Connect Cancer Research Results with the Evidence Behind Them Using AI
AI-powered oncology research support, built on CORE to connect results, evidence and expert review.
Bring permitted genomic results, research literature and study records into one research workflow. OncoResearch is designed to help teams organise findings, identify evidence gaps and prepare summaries for specialist review.
Built on CORE, with scientific interpretation and clinical decisions remaining with qualified experts.
Proposed oncology applications. Partner platform in development.
Producing a Result Is Only the Beginning of Understanding It
Cancer research teams work across laboratory results, analysis outputs, research papers and study records. Connecting these sources, checking their relevance and preparing the evidence for discussion takes skilled people considerable time.
Results and Evidence Sit Apart
A genetic finding may appear in one system while the papers and records needed to understand it sit elsewhere.
Quality and Version Details Need Checking
Researchers need to know which sample, analysis run and software version produced a result, including whether the recorded quality checks passed.
Research Findings Can Conflict
Different sources may report different conclusions. Teams need to see those differences and examine the supporting evidence.
Cohort Gaps Can Be Hard to See
Researchers need visibility into who is represented in the available study records and where important gaps remain.
Permitted Data Use Requires Attention
Access to a record does not settle every question about its permitted use. Relevant consent and data-use conditions still need review.
OncoResearch is proposed to connect results, supporting evidence and review context, helping researchers prepare the material needed for informed discussion.
Bring Research Outputs Into a Connected Evidence Workspace
OncoResearch is a proposed research-support product built on CORE. It is designed to work with the permitted outputs of existing laboratory and analysis systems, then help teams organise records, gather evidence and prepare review material.
Organise the Results
Bring relevant findings, reports and analysis details into searchable records.
Connect the Evidence
Find supporting information in approved research literature and knowledge sources, with references researchers can inspect.
Prepare for Expert Review
Draft summaries that bring together findings, source evidence and unresolved questions.
The product supports the work around scientific results, while established analysis methods and expert judgement remain central.
From Analysis Output to a Summary Specialists Can Examine
The proposed workflow starts with results produced by the team’s established laboratory methods and analysis software.
Receive the Approved Results
Bring in permitted result records, reports and relevant study information from the existing research environment.
Establish the Research Context
Associate each record with its sample, analysis run, method or software version and available quality-check results.
Organise the Findings
Structure the relevant information so researchers can search, compare and review it.
Gather Supporting Evidence
Retrieve relevant material from the approved papers and knowledge sources available to the team.
Highlight Gaps and Conflicts
Make missing information, conflicting findings and recorded quality issues visible for investigation.
Prepare the Review Summary
Draft a factual summary connecting each relevant finding with its supporting records and evidence.
Review with the Experts
A specialist checks the summary. The expert team and treating clinician retain responsibility for scientific interpretation and clinical decisions.
Each summary connects the finding, its research context and the evidence available for review.
Organise the Results. Gather the Evidence. Keep the Questions Visible.
Analysis Run and Quality Tracking
Track analysis runs and surface failed quality checks recorded by the existing laboratory or analysis systems.
Searchable Research Records
Organise permitted result files and reports into structured records that researchers can find and review.
Evidence for Genetic Findings
Gather relevant research evidence around a genetic change and connect the summary to its sources.
Conflicting Evidence Visibility
Present differences between available findings so specialists can examine the evidence and its limitations.
Permitted Cohort Search
Help researchers find groups of authorised study records relevant to a research question.
Cohort Composition Review
Show characteristics recorded in the selected cohort, including available ancestry information, to make representation gaps visible.
Batch and Analysis-Version Comparisons
Track changes across test batches and analysis versions, preserving the context needed to investigate differences.
Case Summaries and Consent References
Prepare factual case summaries and retrieve relevant consent or data-use clauses for human review.
CORE Connects the Knowledge Around Your Scientific Results
CORE provides the proposed foundation for organising permitted records, retrieving relevant knowledge and preparing outputs with source references. OncoResearch applies that foundation to defined oncology and genomics research workflows.
OncoResearch- Approved Results and Research Sources
- Access and Permitted-Use Controls
- CORE Knowledge Foundation
- Record Organisation and Retrieval
- Evidence Gathering and Gap Identification
- Draft Research Summaries
- Specialist Review and Decision
Existing laboratory methods and analysis software produce the scientific results. OncoResearch is designed to help teams work with the permitted outputs and supporting evidence.
Work with the Results and Sources Your Team Already Uses
The proposed integration approach centres on approved outputs and document collections. Supported formats, connections and access conditions would be defined and validated for each pilot.
Permitted outputs and supporting evidenceLaboratory Reporting Systems
Work with permitted reports, sample references and recorded quality-check information.
Genomics Analysis Pipelines
Use outputs from established analysis software, together with the relevant run and version details.
Study Record Repositories
Retrieve authorised study records needed for the defined research question or review.
Research Literature and Knowledge Sources
Gather evidence from the publications and approved knowledge collections available to the team.
Consent and Data-Use Records
Locate relevant clauses and supporting documents for review by the responsible staff.
The starting point is a defined research workflow, an approved set of sources and clear rules for how the information may be used.
Give Researchers More Time to Examine the Evidence
OncoResearch is intended to reduce repeated searching, record assembly and summary preparation. These outcomes would need to be evaluated through a controlled pilot.
Research context
Evidence references
Unresolved questions
Reduce Repeated Information Gathering
Bring relevant results and source material together around a defined research question.
Make Provenance Easier to Follow
Keep findings connected to the sample, analysis context and supporting records.
Expose Unresolved Questions
Show missing or conflicting evidence alongside the prepared summary.
Prepare More Consistent Review Material
Use a defined structure for factual case summaries and evidence references.
Improve Visibility into Cohort Composition
Help teams inspect the representation and limitations of the records selected for research.
Support Research Continuity
Keep evidence and analysis context accessible as work moves between team members.
Pilot evaluation should assess source accuracy, record alignment, evidence coverage, preparation effort and the corrections required during expert review.
Support the Preparation Around Complex Cancer Research Questions
Tumour-Board Preparation
Bring permitted results, relevant reports and supporting research into a factual summary for specialists to review before a case discussion.
Genetic-Finding Evidence Reviews
Gather available evidence around a genetic change and make conflicting findings visible.
Analysis Quality Reviews
Bring failed quality checks and associated run information forward for investigation by the research team.
Cohort Exploration
Find permitted records relevant to a defined research question and inspect the characteristics represented in the selected group.
Batch and Version Comparisons
Examine changes across analysis runs, test batches or software versions with the relevant context available.
Consent and Data-Use Review Preparation
Retrieve the clauses and documents responsible staff need when reviewing a proposed use of research data.
Keep Permitted Use, Evidence and Expert Responsibility Connected
The proposed product requires clear boundaries around access, research use and human review. These controls must be configured and evaluated for the specific research environment.
Authorised Access
Restrict retrieval to the records and sources approved for the user and workflow.
Consent and Data-Use Review
Surface relevant clauses for the responsible person to examine when determining whether a proposed use is permitted.
Traceable Evidence
Connect findings and draft summaries to their supporting records and research sources.
Analysis Context
Retain the available method, run, batch and version information needed to understand how a result was produced.
Visible Limitations
Show missing information, conflicting evidence and gaps in cohort representation.
Specialist Review
Require expert examination of prepared summaries before they inform scientific or clinical decisions.
Controlled Evaluation
Validate each proposed workflow against agreed research tasks, approved data and expert checks before wider use.
OncoResearch is proposed for research support. It does not diagnose cancer, choose treatment or independently classify genetic variants.
See What a Prepared Tumour-Board Research Summary Could Contain
An illustrative walkthrough can show how permitted analysis outputs, reports and research evidence could be organised for specialist review.
The Finding and Its Context
Present the relevant result with its sample, analysis details and recorded quality information.
Start with an approved sample workflow and define how source references, record alignment and summary quality will be assessed.
Where Does Your Team Spend the Most Time Connecting Results and Evidence?
Explore how OncoResearch could support evidence gathering, research-record organisation or case-summary preparation through a focused pilot built on CORE.
Bring one research question, an approved set of records and the checks your experts use. We’ll help define a workflow that can be evaluated.